1. Paper should be in MS word format only.
2. Title of the article: Upper case, Font 14, Bold, Times New Roman.
3. Author/s Name (s): Title case, Font 12, Bold, Times New Roman (*, **), Right Justified. Authors affiliation: *, **, Sentence case, Font 10, Normal Text, Times New Roman.
4. Abstract: Sentence case, Font 10, Normal Text, Times New Roman, Centrally aligned below Title and Author (s). The article must be accompanied by an abstract within 200 words. Below the abstract 3-5 keywords should be mentioned.
5. The articles should be written in English and preferably be within 4000 words in length.
6. Main article: Font 12, Times New Roman, Normal Text (Justify).
7. Reference: Gray, S. J. and Street, D. L. (2001): “Acceptance and Observance of international Accounting Standards: Prospects and Problems”, International Journal of Academic Research in Social Sciences& Humanities, June, pp 4-8.
8. Tables and Figures: table in capital and red in Font 11, and table description in bold, upper lower in Font 12.
9. For other instructions, if required at all, please follow style for APA (American Psychological Association) Journals. Please visit
10. Studies quoted in research articles should be included in references/bibliography. References should be numbered consecutively in the order in which they appear in the text (not in alphabetic order); Vancouver style. List all authors for journal article up to six references. In case of more than six authors, use et. al after the sixth author.
11. Submission: Researcher should send the article through email only.
Email: (or)
12. Address for Correspondence: The researcher should specify his/her full postal address, telephone number, fax and Email ID for Correspondence.
13. Peer Review: All articles received for publication will be peer reviewed. The Executive editor & the Editorial Board will decide on the suitability of the material for publication, which will be final.

Authors will be informed about acceptance or rejection of the articles within 1 month of receipt. The main author will get complimentary copy of the journal in which his/her article is published, provided the author subscribes for the journal.

For all parties involved in the act of publishing (the author(s), the journal editor(s), the peer reviewers, the society, and the publisher) it is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior. The ethics statements for IJARSH Publishing are based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Code of Conduct guidelines available at



The editor of a journal is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published and moreover, is accountable for everything published in the journal. In making these decisions, the editor may be guided by the policies of the journal’s editorial board and/or the policies of the publisher, as well as, by the legal requirements regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers when making publication decisions. The editor should maintain the integrity of the academic record, preclude business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards, and always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions, and apologies when needed.


The editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship or political philosophy of the author(s).


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.


The editor will be guided by COPE’s Guidelines for Retracting Articles when considering retracting, issuing expressions of concern about, and issuing corrections pertaining to articles that have been published in IJARSH. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s own research without the explicit written consent of the author(s). Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. The editor is committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint, or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

The editor should seek so ensure a fair and appropriate peer-review process. The editor should recuse himself/herself from handling manuscripts (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor, or other member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. The editor should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests are revealed after publication. If needed, other appropriate action should be taken, such as the publication of a retraction or expression of concern.



Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communication with the author, may also assist the author in improving the manuscript.


Any invited referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its timely review will be impossible should immediately notify the editor so that alternative reviewers can be contacted.


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except if authorized by the editor.


Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author(s) is inacceptable. Referees should express their views clearly with appropriate supporting arguments.


Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the author(s). Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. Reviewers should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published data of which they have personal knowledge.



Authors reporting results of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the manuscript. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.


The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.


An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Parallel submission of the same manuscript to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.


Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should also cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.


Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be named in an Acknowledgement section. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors are included in the author list of the manuscript, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. All co-authors must be clearly indicated at the time of manuscript submission. Request to add co-authors, after a manuscript has been accepted will require approval of the editor.


All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or their interpretation in the manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.



We protect the intellectual property and copyright of IJARSH Publishing, its imprints, authors and publishing partners by promoting and maintaining each article’s published version of record. IJARSH Publishing ensures the integrity and transparency of each published article with respect to: conflicts of interest, publication and research funding, publication and research ethics, cases of publication and research misconduct, confidentiality, authorship, article corrections, clarifications and retractions, and timely publication of content.


The Editor/ Editorial board and distinguished referees are in no-way responsible individually or collectively for the views, data and technical details presented in the journal. The whole responsibility vests with the authors of the article. If any queries or infringement occurs, subject to Hyderabad jurisdiction.

Signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use Copyright © 2018 – IJARSH